Exploration by Confidence

Within formal concept analysis, attribute exploration is a powerful tool to semiautomatically check data for completeness with respect to a given domain. However, the classical formulation of attribute exploration does not take into account possible errors which are present in the initial data. We present in this work a generalization of attribute exploration based on the notion of confidence, which will allow for the exploration of implications which are not necessarily valid in the initial data, but instead enjoy a minimal confidence therein

A General Form of Attribute Exploration

We present a general form of attribute exploration, a knowledge completion algorithm from formal concept analysis. The aim of this generalization is to extend the applicability of attribute exploration by a general description. Additionally, this may also allow for viewing different existing variants of attribute exploration as instances of a general form, as for example exploration on partial contexts

Learning Terminological Knowledge with High Confidence from Erroneous Data

Description logics knowledge bases are a popular approach to represent terminological and assertional knowledge suitable for computers to work with. Despite that, the practicality of description logics is impaired by the difficulties one has to overcome to construct such knowledge bases. Previous work has addressed this issue by providing methods to learn valid terminological knowledge from data, making use of ideas from formal concept analysis. A basic assumption here is that the data is free of errors, an assumption that can in general not be made for practical applications. This thesis presents extensions of these results that allow to handle errors in the data. For this, knowledge that is "almost valid" in the data is retrieved, where the notion of "almost valid" is formalized using the notion of confidence from data mining. This thesis presents two algorithms which achieve this retrieval. The first algorithm just extracts all almost valid knowledge from the data, while the second algorithm utilizes expert interaction to distinguish errors from rare but valid counterexamples

Axiomatizing Confident GCIs of Finite Interpretations

Constructing description logic ontologies is a difficult task that is normally conducted by experts. Recent results show that parts of ontologies can be constructed from description logic interpretations. However, these results assume the interpretations to be free of errors, which may not be the case for real-world data. To provide some mechanism to handle these errors, the notion of confidence from data mining is introduced into description logics, yielding confident general concept inclusions (confident GCIs) of finite interpretations. The main focus of this work is to prove the existence of finite bases of confident GCIs and to describe some of theses bases explicitly

Axiomatizing Confident GCIs of Finite Interpretations

Constructing description logic ontologies is a difficult task that is normally conducted by experts. Recent results show that parts of ontologies can be constructed from description logic interpretations. However, these results assume the interpretations to be free of errors, which may not be the case for real-world data. To provide some mechanism to handle these errors, the notion of confidence from data mining is introduced into description logics, yielding confident general concept inclusions (confident GCIs) of finite interpretations. The main focus of this work is to prove the existence of finite bases of confident GCIs and to describe some of theses bases explicitly